MISCONCEPTION: AS PER VED VYASA,KARNA AND ARJUNA NEVER FOUGHT TILL 14TH DAY OF KURUKSHETRA WAR-

Blorndies are illiterates,below are the words of Vyasa which they are unable to understand -

"O bull of Bharata's race, by good luck Jishnu did not engage in single combat with Karna "

WHAT BLORNDIES ARE INTERPRETING - As per Vyas,Arjun did not fight even a single battle with Arjuna so viraat yudh is also fake :P

WHAT THIS LINE MEANS - Blorndies are misinterpreting the term 'Single Combat',it means a duel between two single warriors which takes place in the context of a battle between two armies.

Many times,the term 'Single Combat' has been used in KMG translation,blorndies should understand the meanings properly :P It does not mean single battle :v :v

Some Narratives about 'Single Combat' which should enlighten Blorndies -

"Taking up Subhadra on his car, alone he challenged Krishna to single combat."(M 4.49)

"And, O lord, my wish is even for a single combat with Arjuna."(M 1.138)

"with eyes reddened in anger the son of Kunti, desirous of a single combat with him, said these words." (M 4.59)[THIS IS FROM VIRAAT YUDH :P]

"the ruler of the Magadhas, king Jarasandha, challenged him to a single combat" (M 12.5)

(I HOPE BLORNDIES UNDERSTOOD THE MEANING OF SINGLE COMBAT NOW :v)

>> JUST BEFORE THE ABOVE LINE,VED VYAS CLEARLY SAYS THAT ARJUNA FOUGHT KARNA THAT DAY-

Narrative:

"Vyasa said, By good luck, Phalguna liveth still although he had encountered Karna in battle. Indeed, Karna had kept his dart, desirous of slaying Savyasachin"

*** Vyas clearly says that Arjuna encountered Karna in battle.But hopefully they did not fought a battle to death,else Karna would have been forced to use Shakti.

(Arjuna fought Karna many times.After Draupadi Swayamwar,Virat Yudh,12th Day,14th Day before this incident also he was defeated three times by Arjuna.Karna fans should read and try to understand things properly)

>> MOREOVER,VED VYAS HIMSELF EXPOSED KARNA'S INCAPABILITY AGAINST ARJUNA -

Narrative:

O bull of Bharata's race, by good luck Jishnu did not engage in single combat with Karna.Each of them in that case challenging the other, would have shot his celestial weapons on all sides. The weapons of the Suta's son would have been destroyed by Arjuna. The former then afflicted by the latter, would certainly have hurled Indra's dart in that battle. O Yudhishthira!

www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07180.htm

ROFL,VED VYAS CLEARLY SAYS THAT ARJUNA WOULD HAVE DESTROYED THE CELESTIAL WEAPONS OF KARNA AND KARNA AFTER BEING AFFLICTED BY ARJUNA WOULD HAVE BEEN FORCED TO USE SHAKTI ON HIM...VISHNU AVTAR VYAS,THE COMPOSER OF MAHABHARAT CLEARLY SAYS THAT KARNA WAS A ZERO IN FRONT OF ARJUNA,HE COULD HAVE WON ONLY USING SHAKTI :P :v

BLORNDIES WERE TRYING TO PROVE VIRAT YUDH IS INTERPOLATION FROM VYAS'S WORDS,WHICH DIDN'T WORKED :P
BUT THIS NARRATIVE PROVES THAT AS PER VYAS,KARNA DID NOT HAVE ANY WEAPON WHICH ARJUNA COULD NOT NULLIFY,EVEN FAKE NAGASTRA OR BHARGAVASTRA,BECAUSE KARNA COULD HAVE USED AMOGH SHAKTI ONLY WHEN ALL HIS WEAPONS GOT BAFFLED[A CONDITION BY INDRA],AND AS PER VYASA,ARJUNA WOULD HAVE NULLIFIED ALL WEAPONS OF KARNA,THEN ONLY KARNA COULD USE AMOGHA SHAKTI
WHICH MEANS FAKE NAGASTRA AND BHARGAVASTRA COULD BE INTERPOLATIONS,LOL :v

------------------------------

PREVIOUS ENCOUNTERS OF KARNA AND ARJUNA,BEFORE THESE WORDS OF VED VYASA -

1)Post Draupadi Swayamwar Skirmish.(Arjuna defeated Karna)
2)Virata Yudh(Karna defeated 4 times by Arjuna)
3)Kurukshetra,Day 12 (No Result,but Arjun slay three brothers of Karna infront of his eyes)
4)Kurukshetra,Day 14 (Karna defeated 3 times by Arjuna)