MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE SO CALLED 'ADHARMAS' OF PANDAVAS -
There are some hijacked blorndies who have compiled a list of Adharmas committed by the Pandavas.Now the followers of demon Narakasura(Karna) and Demon Kali(Duryodhan) are going to decide what's Dharma and what's Adharma,LOL.
Lets puncture each and every fake argument given by these demon lovers and worshipers.
-----------------------------------------
>>> 1)IT WAS THE PANADAVAS WHO STARTED ENEMITY,BHIMA USED TO TORTURE AND BEAT KAURAVAS DURING CHILDHOOD -
A common accusation by some mentally retarded jerks.Had Bhima really beaten the Kauravas during childhood,they all would have been dead then and there,Lol.
Below is the half narrative through which these idiots fool people-
In speed, in striking the objects aimed at, in consuming articles of food, and scattering dust, Bhimasena beat all the sons of Dhritarashtra. The son of the Wind-god pulled them by the hair_and_made_them_fight_with_one_another, laughing all the while. And Vrikodara easily defeated those hundred and one children of great energy as if they were one instead of being a hundred and one. The second Pandava used to seize them by the hair, and throwing them down, to drag_them_along_the_earth. By this, some had their knees broken, some their heads, and some their shoulders. That youth, sometimes holding ten of them, drowned them in water, till they were nearly_dead. When the sons of Dhritarashtra got up to the boughs of a tree for plucking fruits, Bhima used to shake that tree, by striking it with his foot, so that down came the fruits and the fruitpluckers at the same time.
*** These idiots have cleverly removed the last line from this passage,below it is -
"In fact, those princes were no match for Bhima in pugilistic encounters, in speed, or in skill. Bhima used to make a display of his strength by thus tormenting them in #childishness #but #not #from #malice."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01129.htm
*** Vaisampanya clearly mentions that Bhima used to play with Kauravas,and this tormenting was just out of CHILDISHNESS and NOT MALICE.When children play its common that they get hurt.Just remember your childhood days,fighting with your friends,beating them was so common.Bhima was stronger among all,so its obvious that he would be superior among all.Vyas himself says that its Childishness and not Malice so why so much shout ? Can one interpret Mahabharat better than Vyas and Vaisampanya ?
MOREOVER THE DEMON DURYODHAN PLANNED THE POISIONING OF BHIMA NOT TO AVENGE THE HAMMERING WHICH HIS BROTHERS RECEIVED,BUT BECAUSE HE GOT ENVIOUS OF BHIMA SEEING HIS STRENGTH,IT WAS NOT THE CONCERN FOR HIS BROTHERS,BUT HIS PERSONAL HOSTILITY AS HE COULD NOT BEAR A PERSON SUPERIOR TO HIM-
Narrative:
Seeing these wonderful exhibitions of the might of Bhima, the powerful Duryodhana, the eldest son of Dhritarashtra, began to conceive hostility towards him. And the wicked and unrighteous Duryodhana, through ignorance and ambition, prepared himself for an act of sin. He thought, 'There is no other individual who can compare with Bhima, the second son of Pandu, in point of prowess. I shall have to destroy him by artifice.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01129.htm
*** Here Vaisampanya clearly mentions that 'WICKED' and 'UNRIGHTEOUS' Duryodhan participated in the act of 'SIN'.All this because no one could have competed with Bhima in strength,nowhere written that Duryodhan planned the poison for sake of his brothers.
-------------------------------------------
>>> 2)BHIMA CALLED KARNA A DOG IN RANGSHALA,LOL
I just didn't liked this argument by Pro-Kaurava lovers.Calling Karna a Dog is Animal Abuse,ROFL :P :D
Well lets visit Rangshala and read what Bhima said to Karna -
(Bhima to Karna)
"And, O worst of mortals, surely thou art not worthy to sway the kingdom of Anga, even as a dog doth not deserve the butter placed before the sacrificial fire."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01140.htm
Heights of illiteracy by Kaurava/Karna fans,they can't even understand 'Similies'.
As cool as a cucumber
As fit as a fiddle
As free as a bird
Above were some examples of Similies.
So in simple language,Bhima says that -
"Karna does not deserves to be the King of Anga just as a Dog does not deserves butter placed before the sacrificial fire"
Hindi:
जैसे यज्ञमें अग्निके समीप रक्खे हुए पुरोडाश को कुत्ता नहीं पा सकता,उसी प्रकार तू भी अङदेशका राज्य भोगने योग्य नहीं है
Now someone please explain me where Bhima calls Karna a Dog here ? He is just making a comparison here,why so much issue over this? Nowhere does Bhima calls Karna a dog here.
If I Say - "Rahul Dravid is as cool as a cucumber",it does not mean that i am calling Rahul Dravid a cucumber.
So i hope it brings some sense in the minds of Blorndies.
Secondly,in the Rangshala of Kshatriyas,a Suta isn't allowed as per morals.There is a lot of difference between today and 5000 years before.Don't compare that situation with todays world.Even Kripacharya stopped Karna because as per Shastras it was incorrect.Bhima was morally right.
--------------------------------------------
>>> 3) DRAUPADI INSULTED KARNA IN HER SWAYAMWAR -
We have discussed this upteen times that Draupadi did not stopped Karna in her Swayamwar,But Karna failed in the task.It was an interpolation in FEW 16th century Northern Devanagari Manuscripts.
V.S. Sukthankar,the General Editor of Critical Edition by Bhandarkar, in his prolegomena clearly says that only 3 devanagari scripts out 21, one nepali script and one bengali script has this interpolation.And these are new and inferior manuscripts.While this interpolation is not in the older manuscripts like Sarada,Mithali and other 18 Devanagari scripts,remaining nepali scripts and not in Dakshinatya too.Neither any commentaries on Mahabharat have this interpolation.
-------------------------------------------
>>> 4) ARJUNA BROKE THE CELIBACY RULE DURING EXILE -
Now these illiterates blorndies will understand celibacy.Nowhere in Mahabharat is it that Arjuna broke the celibacy rule.
From Sauptika Parva,its clear that Arjuna never broke celibacy.Had he broken the Celibacy,the Brahmasirastra would have rebounded on him and crushed his head.
We have already written a post on this long back,Covers Ekalavya incident,Foolish propagandas by mentally retarded Karna fans which they fabricated about Ulupi and Chitrangada and of course about the celibacy of Arjuna is covered in this post -
http://on.fb.me/1bKSenp
Lord Krishna even after having 16108 wives is called NITYA BRAHMACHARI, AJANMA BRAHMACHARI and AKHANDA BRAHMACHARI.So explaining celibacy to the duffer blordies is altogether a difficult task.However their favorite KMG translation in Sauptika Parva mentions that Arjuna followed celibacy so it must be sufficient for these blorndies.
--------------------------------------------
>>> 5)ARJUNA, WITH HELP OF KRISHNA,MASS-MASSACRED ENTIRE NAGA CLAN BY SETTING FIRE TO KHANDAV VANA -
Another desperate attempt by illiterate blorndies to malign Arjuna and Sri Krishna.
The Khandava forest, including its dwelling beings, were promised as fodder to Lord Agni by none other than Lord Brahma. It was populated by evil Naga line of Takshaka. Amongst nagas there were good clan - led by Vasuki and bad clan - led by Takshak. Other beings such as rakshasas and their progeny were living in Khandava forest as themselves or as various creatures.
So Khandava was burnt as per the instruction of Brahma,the creator.And the job of burning was assisted by Vishnu,the preserver himself.
So all you hypocrite blorndies,better go and pick a quarrel with Brahma and Vishnu if you have any problem with the Khandava Dahan incident.
We can understand that Blorndies are very sad about this incident because all the inferior and evil nagas were killed here,which could have later supported Lordy in battle.As we can read in Karna parva that All the smaller and evil snakes supported Karna while the good ones (Under Vasuki) supported Arjuna in the battle.
Story about Brahma and Agni regarding Khandava can be found here - http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01226.htm
-----------------------------------------------
>>> 6)PANDAVAS KILLED NISHADA WOMEN IN LAKSHYAGRAH BURING -
Please read this chapter to know the truth - http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01151.htm
Now After reading this,its clear Pandavas didnt burn the Nishada Lady & her sons deliberately but it inadvertently happened because of the consuming fire set up by Purvochana & her wife!!So basically,Pandavas were not responsible for the death of Nishada Lady & her sons but Purvochana & his wife who lit the house of highly flamable "Laka" & whose fire ultimately consumed the Nishada lady & her sons..& offcourse the Lakshagriha Plot masterminds were equally responsible for this unfortunate incident..The three evil wicked trinity who planned the Lakshagriha Plot- "Shakuni,Duryodhana & Karna"..but as usual Karna Fans wont blame them at any cost.
-------------------------------------------------
>>> 7)PANDAVAS DID ADHARMA BY MARRYING DRAUPADI,LOL -
The most foolish and Ignorant Claim by illiterate Blorndies. Lets Puncture it quickly :P
- Draupadi having a Boon from Lord Shiva of getting five husbands in next birth -
Described in detail here - http://on.fb.me/1L0u4lo
- Sage Vyas himself Arranging the marriage of Draupadi with five Pandavas -
Narrative:
Vaisampayana continued, 'Then the illustrious Vyasa, addressing Yudhishthira the just, said, 'This day is an auspicious day, O son of Pandu! This day the moon has entered the constellation called Pushya. Take thou the hand of Krishna today, thyself first before thy brothers!'
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01201.htm
- Drupad himself accepts this marriage -
Narrative:
Now, however, that I know all, I cannot be indifferent to what hath been ordained by the gods. Therefore do I resolve to accomplish what thou hast said. The knot of destiny cannot be untied.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01201.htm
- PREVIOUS RECORDS OF POLYGAMY IN SCRIPTURES
1)Jatila marrying Seven Rishi's -
Narrative:
I have heard in the Purana that a lady of name Jatila, the foremost of all virtuous women belonging to the race of Gotama had married seven Rishis
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01199.htm
2)An Ascetic's daughter's marriage with ten brothers -
Narrative:
So also an ascetic's daughter, born of a tree, had in former times united herself in marriage with ten brothers all bearing the same name of Prachetas and who were all of souls exalted by asceticism.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01199.htm
I hope its enough evidence for blorndies to keep their dirty mouth shut.It was Lord Shiva's boon,the marriage was arranged by Ved Vyas himself,So does that mean Lord Shiva and Sage Vyas committed Adharma ? NOWHERE IN MAHABHARAT IS IT WRITTEN THAT PANDAVAS DID ADHARMA BY MARRYING DRAUPADI.
--------------------------------------------------
>>> 8)PANDAVAS WERE LUSTY ON SEEING DRAUPADI,LOL -
Another Foolish Propaganda by some Jerks(Blorndies).
Firstly,Nowhere is it written that Pandavas were Lusty on seeing Draupadi.They were impressed on seeing the beauty of draupadi which is not wrong.
Secondly,Pandavas had recalled the words which Ved Vyas told them earlier,that they all will be married to a common lady,so nothing wrong at all admiring the beauty of your future wife.
Vyas Telling Pandavas much before swayamwar,that they would be married to a common lady -
Narrative:
The faultless Krishna of Prishata's line hath been appointed to be the wife of you all. Ye mighty ones, go therefore, to the capital of the Panchalas and dwell ye there.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01172.htm
Later Yudhishthir recalls the words of Ved Vyas,When Kunti asks them to Share the 'Bhiksha' among themselves -
Narrative:
'And that bull among men immediately recollected the words of Krishna-Dwaipayana.'
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01194.htm
Its the dirty and pervert mind of Blorndies which makes them imagine these kinds of shit.
-----------------------------------------------------
>>> 9)OTHER MISCONCEPTIONS REGARDING ULUPI,CHITRANGADA AND ARJUN'S CELIBACY CLEARED IN BELOW POST -
LINK - http://on.fb.me/1bKSenp
-----------------------------------------------------
WHY THESE MISCONCEPTIONS ?
We are living in Kaliyug which is full of misleaded,misguided,misinformed and misadvised people. There are many retellings on Mahabharat and related topics written by some pseudo writers who without even understanding the subject properly, fabricated their own story,just for gaining some cheap popularity and TRP.Authors like Shivaji Sawant[For Mrityunjaya book of world records],Anand Neelakantan[For Ajaya,a completely foul and misleading novel written to glorify Kaurvas and malign Pandavas],Devdutt Pattanaik[This was the guy involved in misleading Star Plus Mahabharat] and many other jobless jacks can be found in Kaliyuga for tampering our epics for gaining popularity in market.As per Mahabharat, Pandavas are heroes and Kauravas are Villains,everyone knows this,but the authors who try to fabricate their own stories and make it vice versa will obviously interest more people because people tend to like what does not exists,they just love fantasy/fiction and not the truth.Reminds me of Thurber's short story - The Secret Life of Walter Mitty :P
In my opinion,writing Retellings on Mahabharat should not be allowed by judiciary.Because many writers have already speculated their utter nonsense and spread that in an already confused Indian society.
As far as Pandavas are concerned,they were human beings,they did some mistakes like every human but there is a difference between FAULTS and SINS.Pandavas did some faults but what Kauravas and Karna did were sins.They can't be excused for,they deserve a punishment which all Kauravas and Karna got.
>>> The first description of Pandavas in Mahabharata(First Page of Mahabharat) -
"Yudhishthira is a vast tree, formed of religion and virtue; Arjuna is its trunk; Bhimasena, its branches; the two sons of Madri are its full-grown fruit and flowers; and its roots are Krishna, Brahma, and the Brahmanas"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01002.htm
>>> Every Parva of Mahabharat is started with bowing down to Narayana and Nara,who are Shri Krishna and Arjuna themselves -
"Om! Having bowed down to Narayana and Nara, the most exalted male being, and also to the goddess Saraswati, must the word Jaya be uttered."
The Idiots who still think Pandavas were 'Adharmis' have missed a very important sloka from Mahabharat,which is mentioned upteen times -
यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः
"Where there is Dharma,there is victory"
This sloka is the Summary of Mahabharat,even the so called hero of Blorndies accepted this during the supposed meeting with Krishna in Udyoga Parva.The one who understands this,understands the whole Mahabharat,the one who doesn't or rather the ones with demonic traits,will always be frustrated.He will curse Mahabharata narrators and even Vyas.He will read Mahabharat with a microscope and try to find something good for their heroes and always try to find exploits of Pandavas,will come back with their foolish theories which will be found relevant by people as intelligent as blorndies,and it would finally end up with their mockery being made all over the internet :P
There are some hijacked blorndies who have compiled a list of Adharmas committed by the Pandavas.Now the followers of demon Narakasura(Karna) and Demon Kali(Duryodhan) are going to decide what's Dharma and what's Adharma,LOL.
Lets puncture each and every fake argument given by these demon lovers and worshipers.
-----------------------------------------
>>> 1)IT WAS THE PANADAVAS WHO STARTED ENEMITY,BHIMA USED TO TORTURE AND BEAT KAURAVAS DURING CHILDHOOD -
A common accusation by some mentally retarded jerks.Had Bhima really beaten the Kauravas during childhood,they all would have been dead then and there,Lol.
Below is the half narrative through which these idiots fool people-
In speed, in striking the objects aimed at, in consuming articles of food, and scattering dust, Bhimasena beat all the sons of Dhritarashtra. The son of the Wind-god pulled them by the hair_and_made_them_fight_with_one_another, laughing all the while. And Vrikodara easily defeated those hundred and one children of great energy as if they were one instead of being a hundred and one. The second Pandava used to seize them by the hair, and throwing them down, to drag_them_along_the_earth. By this, some had their knees broken, some their heads, and some their shoulders. That youth, sometimes holding ten of them, drowned them in water, till they were nearly_dead. When the sons of Dhritarashtra got up to the boughs of a tree for plucking fruits, Bhima used to shake that tree, by striking it with his foot, so that down came the fruits and the fruitpluckers at the same time.
*** These idiots have cleverly removed the last line from this passage,below it is -
"In fact, those princes were no match for Bhima in pugilistic encounters, in speed, or in skill. Bhima used to make a display of his strength by thus tormenting them in #childishness #but #not #from #malice."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01129.htm
*** Vaisampanya clearly mentions that Bhima used to play with Kauravas,and this tormenting was just out of CHILDISHNESS and NOT MALICE.When children play its common that they get hurt.Just remember your childhood days,fighting with your friends,beating them was so common.Bhima was stronger among all,so its obvious that he would be superior among all.Vyas himself says that its Childishness and not Malice so why so much shout ? Can one interpret Mahabharat better than Vyas and Vaisampanya ?
MOREOVER THE DEMON DURYODHAN PLANNED THE POISIONING OF BHIMA NOT TO AVENGE THE HAMMERING WHICH HIS BROTHERS RECEIVED,BUT BECAUSE HE GOT ENVIOUS OF BHIMA SEEING HIS STRENGTH,IT WAS NOT THE CONCERN FOR HIS BROTHERS,BUT HIS PERSONAL HOSTILITY AS HE COULD NOT BEAR A PERSON SUPERIOR TO HIM-
Narrative:
Seeing these wonderful exhibitions of the might of Bhima, the powerful Duryodhana, the eldest son of Dhritarashtra, began to conceive hostility towards him. And the wicked and unrighteous Duryodhana, through ignorance and ambition, prepared himself for an act of sin. He thought, 'There is no other individual who can compare with Bhima, the second son of Pandu, in point of prowess. I shall have to destroy him by artifice.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01129.htm
*** Here Vaisampanya clearly mentions that 'WICKED' and 'UNRIGHTEOUS' Duryodhan participated in the act of 'SIN'.All this because no one could have competed with Bhima in strength,nowhere written that Duryodhan planned the poison for sake of his brothers.
-------------------------------------------
>>> 2)BHIMA CALLED KARNA A DOG IN RANGSHALA,LOL
I just didn't liked this argument by Pro-Kaurava lovers.Calling Karna a Dog is Animal Abuse,ROFL :P :D
Well lets visit Rangshala and read what Bhima said to Karna -
(Bhima to Karna)
"And, O worst of mortals, surely thou art not worthy to sway the kingdom of Anga, even as a dog doth not deserve the butter placed before the sacrificial fire."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01140.htm
Heights of illiteracy by Kaurava/Karna fans,they can't even understand 'Similies'.
As cool as a cucumber
As fit as a fiddle
As free as a bird
Above were some examples of Similies.
So in simple language,Bhima says that -
"Karna does not deserves to be the King of Anga just as a Dog does not deserves butter placed before the sacrificial fire"
Hindi:
जैसे यज्ञमें अग्निके समीप रक्खे हुए पुरोडाश को कुत्ता नहीं पा सकता,उसी प्रकार तू भी अङदेशका राज्य भोगने योग्य नहीं है
Now someone please explain me where Bhima calls Karna a Dog here ? He is just making a comparison here,why so much issue over this? Nowhere does Bhima calls Karna a dog here.
If I Say - "Rahul Dravid is as cool as a cucumber",it does not mean that i am calling Rahul Dravid a cucumber.
So i hope it brings some sense in the minds of Blorndies.
Secondly,in the Rangshala of Kshatriyas,a Suta isn't allowed as per morals.There is a lot of difference between today and 5000 years before.Don't compare that situation with todays world.Even Kripacharya stopped Karna because as per Shastras it was incorrect.Bhima was morally right.
--------------------------------------------
>>> 3) DRAUPADI INSULTED KARNA IN HER SWAYAMWAR -
We have discussed this upteen times that Draupadi did not stopped Karna in her Swayamwar,But Karna failed in the task.It was an interpolation in FEW 16th century Northern Devanagari Manuscripts.
V.S. Sukthankar,the General Editor of Critical Edition by Bhandarkar, in his prolegomena clearly says that only 3 devanagari scripts out 21, one nepali script and one bengali script has this interpolation.And these are new and inferior manuscripts.While this interpolation is not in the older manuscripts like Sarada,Mithali and other 18 Devanagari scripts,remaining nepali scripts and not in Dakshinatya too.Neither any commentaries on Mahabharat have this interpolation.
-------------------------------------------
>>> 4) ARJUNA BROKE THE CELIBACY RULE DURING EXILE -
Now these illiterates blorndies will understand celibacy.Nowhere in Mahabharat is it that Arjuna broke the celibacy rule.
From Sauptika Parva,its clear that Arjuna never broke celibacy.Had he broken the Celibacy,the Brahmasirastra would have rebounded on him and crushed his head.
We have already written a post on this long back,Covers Ekalavya incident,Foolish propagandas by mentally retarded Karna fans which they fabricated about Ulupi and Chitrangada and of course about the celibacy of Arjuna is covered in this post -
http://on.fb.me/1bKSenp
Lord Krishna even after having 16108 wives is called NITYA BRAHMACHARI, AJANMA BRAHMACHARI and AKHANDA BRAHMACHARI.So explaining celibacy to the duffer blordies is altogether a difficult task.However their favorite KMG translation in Sauptika Parva mentions that Arjuna followed celibacy so it must be sufficient for these blorndies.
--------------------------------------------
>>> 5)ARJUNA, WITH HELP OF KRISHNA,MASS-MASSACRED ENTIRE NAGA CLAN BY SETTING FIRE TO KHANDAV VANA -
Another desperate attempt by illiterate blorndies to malign Arjuna and Sri Krishna.
The Khandava forest, including its dwelling beings, were promised as fodder to Lord Agni by none other than Lord Brahma. It was populated by evil Naga line of Takshaka. Amongst nagas there were good clan - led by Vasuki and bad clan - led by Takshak. Other beings such as rakshasas and their progeny were living in Khandava forest as themselves or as various creatures.
So Khandava was burnt as per the instruction of Brahma,the creator.And the job of burning was assisted by Vishnu,the preserver himself.
So all you hypocrite blorndies,better go and pick a quarrel with Brahma and Vishnu if you have any problem with the Khandava Dahan incident.
We can understand that Blorndies are very sad about this incident because all the inferior and evil nagas were killed here,which could have later supported Lordy in battle.As we can read in Karna parva that All the smaller and evil snakes supported Karna while the good ones (Under Vasuki) supported Arjuna in the battle.
Story about Brahma and Agni regarding Khandava can be found here - http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01226.htm
-----------------------------------------------
>>> 6)PANDAVAS KILLED NISHADA WOMEN IN LAKSHYAGRAH BURING -
Please read this chapter to know the truth - http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01151.htm
Now After reading this,its clear Pandavas didnt burn the Nishada Lady & her sons deliberately but it inadvertently happened because of the consuming fire set up by Purvochana & her wife!!So basically,Pandavas were not responsible for the death of Nishada Lady & her sons but Purvochana & his wife who lit the house of highly flamable "Laka" & whose fire ultimately consumed the Nishada lady & her sons..& offcourse the Lakshagriha Plot masterminds were equally responsible for this unfortunate incident..The three evil wicked trinity who planned the Lakshagriha Plot- "Shakuni,Duryodhana & Karna"..but as usual Karna Fans wont blame them at any cost.
-------------------------------------------------
>>> 7)PANDAVAS DID ADHARMA BY MARRYING DRAUPADI,LOL -
The most foolish and Ignorant Claim by illiterate Blorndies. Lets Puncture it quickly :P
- Draupadi having a Boon from Lord Shiva of getting five husbands in next birth -
Described in detail here - http://on.fb.me/1L0u4lo
- Sage Vyas himself Arranging the marriage of Draupadi with five Pandavas -
Narrative:
Vaisampayana continued, 'Then the illustrious Vyasa, addressing Yudhishthira the just, said, 'This day is an auspicious day, O son of Pandu! This day the moon has entered the constellation called Pushya. Take thou the hand of Krishna today, thyself first before thy brothers!'
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01201.htm
- Drupad himself accepts this marriage -
Narrative:
Now, however, that I know all, I cannot be indifferent to what hath been ordained by the gods. Therefore do I resolve to accomplish what thou hast said. The knot of destiny cannot be untied.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01201.htm
- PREVIOUS RECORDS OF POLYGAMY IN SCRIPTURES
1)Jatila marrying Seven Rishi's -
Narrative:
I have heard in the Purana that a lady of name Jatila, the foremost of all virtuous women belonging to the race of Gotama had married seven Rishis
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01199.htm
2)An Ascetic's daughter's marriage with ten brothers -
Narrative:
So also an ascetic's daughter, born of a tree, had in former times united herself in marriage with ten brothers all bearing the same name of Prachetas and who were all of souls exalted by asceticism.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01199.htm
I hope its enough evidence for blorndies to keep their dirty mouth shut.It was Lord Shiva's boon,the marriage was arranged by Ved Vyas himself,So does that mean Lord Shiva and Sage Vyas committed Adharma ? NOWHERE IN MAHABHARAT IS IT WRITTEN THAT PANDAVAS DID ADHARMA BY MARRYING DRAUPADI.
--------------------------------------------------
>>> 8)PANDAVAS WERE LUSTY ON SEEING DRAUPADI,LOL -
Another Foolish Propaganda by some Jerks(Blorndies).
Firstly,Nowhere is it written that Pandavas were Lusty on seeing Draupadi.They were impressed on seeing the beauty of draupadi which is not wrong.
Secondly,Pandavas had recalled the words which Ved Vyas told them earlier,that they all will be married to a common lady,so nothing wrong at all admiring the beauty of your future wife.
Vyas Telling Pandavas much before swayamwar,that they would be married to a common lady -
Narrative:
The faultless Krishna of Prishata's line hath been appointed to be the wife of you all. Ye mighty ones, go therefore, to the capital of the Panchalas and dwell ye there.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01172.htm
Later Yudhishthir recalls the words of Ved Vyas,When Kunti asks them to Share the 'Bhiksha' among themselves -
Narrative:
'And that bull among men immediately recollected the words of Krishna-Dwaipayana.'
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01194.htm
Its the dirty and pervert mind of Blorndies which makes them imagine these kinds of shit.
-----------------------------------------------------
>>> 9)OTHER MISCONCEPTIONS REGARDING ULUPI,CHITRANGADA AND ARJUN'S CELIBACY CLEARED IN BELOW POST -
LINK - http://on.fb.me/1bKSenp
-----------------------------------------------------
WHY THESE MISCONCEPTIONS ?
We are living in Kaliyug which is full of misleaded,misguided,misinformed and misadvised people. There are many retellings on Mahabharat and related topics written by some pseudo writers who without even understanding the subject properly, fabricated their own story,just for gaining some cheap popularity and TRP.Authors like Shivaji Sawant[For Mrityunjaya book of world records],Anand Neelakantan[For Ajaya,a completely foul and misleading novel written to glorify Kaurvas and malign Pandavas],Devdutt Pattanaik[This was the guy involved in misleading Star Plus Mahabharat] and many other jobless jacks can be found in Kaliyuga for tampering our epics for gaining popularity in market.As per Mahabharat, Pandavas are heroes and Kauravas are Villains,everyone knows this,but the authors who try to fabricate their own stories and make it vice versa will obviously interest more people because people tend to like what does not exists,they just love fantasy/fiction and not the truth.Reminds me of Thurber's short story - The Secret Life of Walter Mitty :P
In my opinion,writing Retellings on Mahabharat should not be allowed by judiciary.Because many writers have already speculated their utter nonsense and spread that in an already confused Indian society.
As far as Pandavas are concerned,they were human beings,they did some mistakes like every human but there is a difference between FAULTS and SINS.Pandavas did some faults but what Kauravas and Karna did were sins.They can't be excused for,they deserve a punishment which all Kauravas and Karna got.
>>> The first description of Pandavas in Mahabharata(First Page of Mahabharat) -
"Yudhishthira is a vast tree, formed of religion and virtue; Arjuna is its trunk; Bhimasena, its branches; the two sons of Madri are its full-grown fruit and flowers; and its roots are Krishna, Brahma, and the Brahmanas"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01002.htm
>>> Every Parva of Mahabharat is started with bowing down to Narayana and Nara,who are Shri Krishna and Arjuna themselves -
"Om! Having bowed down to Narayana and Nara, the most exalted male being, and also to the goddess Saraswati, must the word Jaya be uttered."
The Idiots who still think Pandavas were 'Adharmis' have missed a very important sloka from Mahabharat,which is mentioned upteen times -
यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः
"Where there is Dharma,there is victory"
This sloka is the Summary of Mahabharat,even the so called hero of Blorndies accepted this during the supposed meeting with Krishna in Udyoga Parva.The one who understands this,understands the whole Mahabharat,the one who doesn't or rather the ones with demonic traits,will always be frustrated.He will curse Mahabharata narrators and even Vyas.He will read Mahabharat with a microscope and try to find something good for their heroes and always try to find exploits of Pandavas,will come back with their foolish theories which will be found relevant by people as intelligent as blorndies,and it would finally end up with their mockery being made all over the internet :P
Comments
Post a Comment